Local News

Djokovic beats Federer in Basel

Home invasion: Djokovic beats Federer in BaselFederer lost his home tournament on Sunday, falling 6-4, 4-6, 6-2 to Novak Djokovic in the Swiss Indoors final. Djokovic earned his fourth tournament win of the season with a victory that ended Federer’s run of three straight titles at the tournament. “It’s disappointing to lose at home in the finals, no doubt,” Federer said. “I thought I missed plenty of opportunities. I’m not looking for excuses. He played tough and he played well when he had to, and saved a ton of break points that were crucial.”

Djokovic improved to 3-2 this year against Federer, and said the top-ranked Swiss pushed him to his limits. “I have to produce something special to win,” Djokovic said at sold-out St. Jakobshalle. The second-seeded Serb clinched the first set by saving five break points in a game that lasted 24 minutes. “It was maybe the turning point in the whole match,” Djokovic said. “I was fortunate to keep my nerves.”

Integer adipiscing; nunc eget porttitor suscipit, metus neque tincidunt dui, suscipit semper lectus sem eu nibh. Nam mi quam, varius et congue sed, suscipit eu nibh. Quisque rhoncus mattis mauris vitae gravida. Duis scelerisque lorem porta lacus posuere vel tincidunt ipsum sagittis. Aliquam feugiat consectetur nisi ut gravida. Sed nec nulla mauris. Mauris interdum, quam vel hendrerit tempor, urna eros convallis diam, vel luctus massa libero sed quam. Suspendisse a tempor elit. Aenean sollicitudin convallis pellentesque. Vivamus fermentum congue adipiscing. Suspendisse potenti. In id mauris eros, eu molestie enim. Morbi ut massa sapien! Nullam posuere porttitor sem sagittis porttitor. Curabitur sodales tristique volutpat. Vestibulum elit metus; tincidunt pharetra rutrum at, ultrices in ligula. In iaculis pharetra velit, id hendrerit nisi aliquet eu. Etiam vitae metus eget massa sollicitudin vestibulum.

Aliquam sagittis varius ante id iaculis? Quisque metus nisl, tincidunt nec ultrices a, porta suscipit nisl? Duis tempus volutpat lorem. Maecenas ligula arcu, sodales id commodo sit amet, pretium non erat. Nam egestas gravida nunc, eget dapibus odio euismod eget. Proin mattis tincidunt massa et lobortis. Cras scelerisque hendrerit nisl, eget convallis tortor pretium vel. Nullam nec orci risus, elementum ornare massa. Vestibulum tempor aliquam sapien, in aliquet massa ullamcorper eget. Praesent bibendum libero ut mi porta placerat. Duis eget nisi lectus. Quisque egestas sodales tincidunt. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Sed ultrices elementum lectus quis vestibulum. Quisque sit amet dapibus risus. Donec viverra elementum mi, nec tincidunt eros consectetur non.

Sed vitae nisi ac nulla varius pulvinar at molestie felis. Nunc at tincidunt justo. Vestibulum tortor leo, consequat id posuere ac, hendrerit vitae justo. Nunc scelerisque pulvinar mattis. Cras facilisis risus ornare neque fringilla lacinia. Nulla et purus vel libero pretium varius et sit amet nisi. Etiam varius pellentesque vulputate. Vestibulum fringilla bibendum fringilla. Ut tempus mauris in massa eleifend vitae bibendum odio venenatis. Integer fermentum condimentum lorem. Mauris mattis volutpat aliquam. Aenean venenatis convallis ligula, viverra convallis purus blandit sit amet. Sed sodales eros id dolor posuere laoreet tincidunt ipsum rutrum? Mauris eget nisl sit amet lorem convallis pellentesque? Sed eleifend, ipsum nec suscipit posuere, mauris libero laoreet tortor, quis elementum lectus ligula at sapien. Duis quis diam sed enim accumsan malesuada ac sit amet turpis. Pellentesque sit amet urna justo. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas.

Nulla et odio erat, sed facilisis sapien. Phasellus tincidunt rutrum consectetur. Proin consectetur; enim eu bibendum pellentesque; est risus molestie erat, a tempor velit velit quis leo? Sed cursus augue pellentesque dui dictum bibendum. Maecenas eget mauris eget ipsum elementum vehicula et vel odio. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Vestibulum vulputate, quam non iaculis vulputate, quam turpis aliquam lorem, sed dictum tortor nulla ac erat. Nulla facilisi. Ut facilisis malesuada urna, mattis rhoncus turpis vestibulum at. Cras convallis felis non tellus tempor id pulvinar diam ultricies. Sed lorem est, cursus et pulvinar sit amet, tempor in est.


Citigroup in race to repay

Citigroup is racing against the clock to convince US authoritiesCitigroup is racing against the clock to convince US authorities that it be allowed to repay $20bn of bail-out funds, with insiders and regulators arguing that unless the bank acts in the next 10 days it will have to wait for more than a month. Maecenas sit amet auctor ligula. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Curabitur fringilla pulvinar faucibus. Maecenas elit mi, fringilla ultricies dictum a, ornare quis nunc? Donec dictum neque vitae dui suscipit sollicitudin. Praesent diam metus, sodales a sagittis ac, ullamcorper viverra justo. Nunc cursus pharetra risus volutpat condimentum. Donec aliquet, mauris eu elementum blandit, sapien nibh porta nulla, nec aliquet mi nisl vulputate nulla. Donec feugiat, nisl in venenatis faucibus, velit diam luctus lorem, vel ultricies dui urna sed lacus. Curabitur nibh ante, sollicitudin in fringilla feugiat, blandit ullamcorper risus. Nam quis nibh sit amet sem adipiscing mattis a non lacus.

Nunc et quam mi? Aliquam orci turpis, auctor vitae vestibulum tempus, tempor eu lorem! Donec eu libero nisi. Nunc id lectus adipiscing nisl ullamcorper pellentesque. Sed egestas purus ut est semper lobortis. In at nulla ut elit placerat elementum fringilla tincidunt felis! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed id odio lectus, sit amet mollis arcu. Quisque dapibus posuere quam id tristique. Suspendisse quis ullamcorper nisl. Integer lacinia iaculis enim, gravida commodo augue cursus nec. Phasellus augue urna, blandit ac blandit ac; adipiscing at orci. Praesent sed nibh diam, tempus ornare erat. Aliquam purus arcu, pellentesque eu sagittis non, egestas eget odio. Morbi egestas leo sit amet est tempus eu fringilla ipsum congue. Donec gravida, ante ac feugiat cursus, mi diam cursus augue, a luctus enim sem nec turpis. Nunc vulputate auctor erat eget lobortis.

Nulla venenatis mollis diam, vel ultricies urna pretium vel! Vivamus nec nisi diam. Quisque fermentum, nunc eu ultricies posuere, nulla velit vulputate lacus, a vehicula elit velit eget justo. Suspendisse potenti. Nullam non enim sapien? Quisque sed purus a leo ullamcorper feugiat ut ut eros. Duis facilisis lorem a eros accumsan facilisis. Suspendisse at purus in erat sagittis posuere! Praesent id enim dolor, eget egestas dolor. Duis sed justo odio, at vestibulum augue. Etiam posuere leo ac ipsum consectetur eget porta risus convallis. Aliquam viverra auctor arcu a faucibus. Nullam nibh ligula, iaculis sit amet dignissim et, tincidunt et lacus. Suspendisse id ligula quis felis pharetra vulputate quis vitae ligula.

Aliquam dictum ultricies quam, id sollicitudin purus condimentum vitae. Donec diam purus, eleifend sit amet accumsan non, facilisis nec nisi. Mauris ut neque in eros interdum fermentum. Morbi pharetra sodales sollicitudin. Cras elementum varius sodales. Ut eget velit orci. Nulla rhoncus; eros in aliquam dictum, dui erat pretium ante, at imperdiet nisi metus at libero. Vestibulum magna massa; elementum adipiscing aliquet sit amet, ultricies et turpis. Integer volutpat, ante ut elementum laoreet, quam est euismod felis, sed fermentum metus mauris quis libero. Etiam eu diam enim. Quisque eros augue, dignissim eget vehicula eu, tincidunt at eros. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. In ut elit risus. Aenean id posuere justo! Pellentesque non arcu arcu, id commodo mauris? Phasellus sed turpis ligula. Morbi leo odio, ultrices sed gravida sit amet, viverra tincidunt diam. Suspendisse erat est, euismod vel venenatis id, suscipit et libero.

Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Integer ultricies tellus eu quam mattis tempor. Fusce vitae libero metus, at scelerisque tellus. Praesent a felis est, sed commodo nulla? Duis condimentum aliquet porttitor. Proin lectus erat, facilisis a tincidunt id, congue ut risus. Pellentesque at velit ipsum, in viverra dui. Suspendisse vel dictum nisl. Pellentesque faucibus metus id mauris hendrerit et egestas tellus egestas. Praesent quis neque nec magna faucibus tempus. Duis velit felis, facilisis sit amet adipiscing sed, hendrerit vitae nunc. Morbi enim velit, vehicula id dapibus eget, euismod vitae eros.


Things will be different for Tiger

He will be back like never seen before.Whether that means both Rachel and Jaimee, or just multiple sessions with Jaimee, I don't know and I don't care. A line from the Judd Apatow movie "Funny People" springs to mind. Adam Sandler plays a comic named George, who thinks he's dying. Apatow's real-life wife, Leslie Mann, plays Laura, George's former girlfriend but the true love of his life. Laura says to him, "Why did you cheat on me? I was so hot." Men are strange. We know that. Elin Nordegren: I don't know her, but I've seen her around. She's beautiful, smart, dignified. Swedish. Why did you cheat on me? I was so hot.

But Tiger did, and now he's done what he shouldn't have to do: admit it in public, just like Bill Clinton. Kenneth Starr trapped Clinton and the tabloids trapped Tiger. Both men were put in a corner where they had no choice but to confess. Many sane people will hold Clinton to a higher standard — he was the president of the United States — but Clinton has remained a beloved figure to many. I think Tiger will emerge mostly unscathed as well.

(An aside: I had always thought Tiger was so smart. Turns out, Maxwell Smart was smarter. He never cheated on the beautiful Agent 99. And how did Woods think, in this plugged-in age, that he would never get turned in? Didn't he follow the Eliot Spitzer story?)

Still, you underestimate a man's desire to have sex at your own peril. Others, men and women both, crave other things: proximity to celebrity, illicit excitement, fame no matter how it arrives. This used to be the stuff of novels. No need to make things up these days.

Things will be different for Tiger now. The racists, too numerable to count, now have more fodder, and they will hate Woods even more but continue to express it anonymously. Others will simply be disappointed in the man. But a far greater number will see Woods as more human, more interesting, less robotic, more like us. That is to say, flawed. And that will be good for Woods. Be recognized as a member of the human race, it's nice. Moralists will point to him, red-faced, finger shaking, and say, "Sinner!" But they will continue to buy Nike sneakers whenever they go on sale at SneakerTown. "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." Tough grammatically, but otherwise a pretty damn good sentiment to remember right about now.

Maecenas sit amet sem sit amet odio posuere consectetur. Sed lorem metus, interdum ac dignissim vel, facilisis ut lectus. Sed id ante metus. Maecenas eu turpis urna. Proin diam velit, blandit sit amet elementum quis, malesuada ac metus. Praesent nisi nunc, iaculis vel adipiscing vel, dignissim consequat purus. Praesent id urna sapien. Aliquam luctus ullamcorper eros, ut placerat magna fermentum nec? Nulla facilisi. Donec in urna augue. Quisque aliquet fermentum lectus in malesuada. Vivamus vestibulum volutpat nisi vulputate auctor. Nulla facilisi. Donec at sem lectus! Ut justo diam, accumsan at pulvinar in, vulputate nec justo. Proin eleifend porta mollis.

Aliquam blandit odio nec nibh hendrerit vestibulum. Ut blandit cursus lobortis. Donec fermentum tellus porta felis congue vehicula congue tellus fringilla. Mauris vitae tortor augue, sit amet egestas nunc. Cras erat elit, vestibulum id dignissim sed, dignissim non erat! Aliquam vitae nisi sit amet velit rhoncus lobortis. Nam et dictum ligula. Sed pretium tempus arcu, ut venenatis mi tempus ut? Curabitur faucibus dapibus enim sed convallis? Pellentesque elementum rhoncus nisl eget ornare. Nunc blandit dolor at felis ultrices id viverra urna pellentesque. Maecenas tristique, dui euismod feugiat hendrerit, purus velit molestie nulla, eget scelerisque est arcu sit amet leo. Aliquam erat volutpat. Aliquam lacus neque, sollicitudin a viverra a, sollicitudin eu arcu. Curabitur rhoncus posuere diam, at vehicula urna condimentum eget.

Donec sem tortor, semper ut eleifend sit amet, tempus sed nisi! Aliquam erat volutpat. Nulla suscipit sapien at risus fringilla faucibus. Nunc eu nisi lacus, non sodales tellus. Sed vitae ultrices dolor! Nullam ultrices leo eu ante volutpat et suscipit mauris dapibus. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Sed ut turpis nulla, sit amet tempor ante. Mauris eros massa; convallis eu pulvinar non, posuere eu orci? Mauris elementum gravida massa, eget pulvinar dolor condimentum eu. Sed non lectus sit amet ipsum gravida rhoncus aliquam quis leo. Morbi rhoncus nisl nec ante luctus in pharetra magna gravida. Phasellus viverra eros ac risus mattis et varius lectus laoreet. Curabitur aliquet laoreet sollicitudin. Proin viverra elementum interdum. Maecenas fringilla dapibus felis in convallis. Nam at elementum velit. Duis sodales odio ut augue lacinia tempor.

2012 We Were Warned

We were warned. The end is here.People who view screenwriting as an art and don't particularly care about audience reaction to their films bristle at the thought of screenplay classes, in which Plot Element A and Plot Element B can be put together in such a way that-- voila!-- a hit is born. But Roland Emmerich has taken that very kind of formula writing and made a veritable empire out of it, returning every few years to destroy some corner of the earth and invent a handful of earnest heroes, wisecracking sidekicks and solemn old men to survive his newest take on the apocalypse.

With 2012, as you probably could have guessed from the poster art of tidal waves crashing over the Himalayas, Emmerich is letting go of whatever restraint he might have had before. Clocking in at nearly three hours, boasting about a dozen major characters and at least half a dozen emotional death scenes, 2012 operates on the assumption that, if we liked seeing New York destroyed in The Day After Tomorrow and Washington D.C. zapped in Independence Day, we'll really love witnessing the wholesale destruction of the globe.

I hate to say it, but Emmerich is pretty much right. Far from conveying the horrors that might befall us should anything remotely so destructive happen, 2012 feels more like a soothing bath of Hollywood tropes and cliches, allowing us to witness Los Angeles slide into the ocean like Atlantis, but then warming us with a Woody Harrelson wisecrack and a rousing speech from Chiwetel Ejiofor. It's numbing, sure, especially when the first half is nothing but CGI explosion after another, but on some level it's exactly what we expect out of Hollywood-- shallow spectacle and a bevy of stars, an adventure and a few moral lessons, a giant budget spent guaranteeing we won't feel a bit different than we did when walking into the theater.

If there's any surprise at all in 2012, it's that Chiwetel Ejiofor, not John Cusack, is in fact the star of the film. We meet him in what amount to the film's prologue, a White House-employed geologist trying to prove to a cynical chief of staff (Oliver Platt, wonderfully hammy and villainous) that, in fact, the end is nigh. The cause is less important than the results-- giant fissures open up in the earth's surface, mountains turns to volcanos and skyscrapers turn to ash, and eventually tidal waves cover the entire earth's surface.

Billions of people die in the ensuing melee, but there are only a few we're instructed to care about. Chief among them is Cusack and his family, who start driving out of Los Angeles seconds before the destruction begins thanks to a tip from Woody Harrelson, who plays a Yellowstone-residing conspiracy theorist who saw the whole thing coming and made a YouTube video about it (Emmerich's nods toward modern concerns, like casting Danny Glover as the President and having characters constantly complain about cell service, head toward parody when Harrelson demands that Cusack "download my blog.") Plot mechanics too silly to describe require Cusack, his ex-wife (Amanda Peet), her new boyfriend (Tom McCarthy) and their cutesy kids (Liam James and Morgan Lily) to fly a series of planes on their way to China, where they intend to save their own skins in a manner that's best left discovered in the theater.

Somewhere along the way George Segal perishes on a cruise ship, Danny Glover does the heroic Presidential thing, a Russian oligarch and his bratty kids team up with Cusack and company, and the main players in Washington-- plus the President's comely daughter (Thandie Newton)-- all make their way to a souped-up version of Dick Cheney's undisclosed location. The final quarter of the film, while utterly unnecessary to the disaster elements, is also the best section, finally abandoning generic and plasticine CGI for situations that feel real and dangerous. There's no villain here, unless you count the merely loathsome Platt character, so it takes a lot of effort to keep putting the characters in danger, and by the end of the movie, Emmerich has most certainly run out ideas. But there's something about the scale of it all, or maybe the way seemingly random characters tie into the main plot, that keeps the train chugging along. When Ejiofor gets to make his hero speech, and certain bad characters make good at the eleventh hour, it's not quite a "This is our Independence Day!" moment, but it does come closer than any of Emmerich's films since then. Somehow he's got a real heart beating inside his movie, and no amount of groaner one-liners or thunderous explosions can take that away.

Emmerich claims that 2012 is his final disaster movie, unless Independence Day 2 ever gets off the ground, and the movie is nothing if not an indulgent curtain call for the man who figured out how much we like watching cinematic portrayals of our own demise. It's all the reasons we've ever loved or hated his movies, but also a reminder of why it's high time to move on. When he ends the movie, no lie, on a bathroom, joke, it's not exactly going out on top, but those of us who love Emmerich despite him wouldn't have wanted it any other way.

Photo Gallery 


Kids talk to soldier dad in Ir

President-elect Barack Obama intends to sign off on Pentagon plans to send up to 30,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan, but the incoming administration does not anticipate that the Iraq-like See details


U.S. lacks mechanism to accura

President-elect Barack Obama intends to sign off on Pentagon plans to send up to 30,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan, but the incoming administration does not anticipate that the Iraq-like See details


US Tank and Cryogenics has ove

President-elect Barack Obama intends to sign off on Pentagon plans to send up to 30,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan, but the incoming administration does not anticipate that the Iraq-like See details


The Black Hawk helicopter seri

President-elect Barack Obama intends to sign off on Pentagon plans to send up to 30,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan, but the incoming administration does not anticipate that the Iraq-like See details


Listen to child soldiers, woun

President-elect Barack Obama intends to sign off on Pentagon plans to send up to 30,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan, but the incoming administration does not anticipate that the Iraq-like See details


Helicopters carried US and Afg

Rioting has erupted at a march to commemorate the killing of a 15-year-old boy who was shot by Greek police in 2008. Officers fired tear gas at scores of hooded See details


We left the observation post t

President-elect Barack Obama intends to sign off on Pentagon plans to send up to 30,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan, but the incoming administration does not anticipate that the Iraq-like See details


Street Battles As Army Tackles

President-elect Barack Obama intends to sign off on Pentagon plans to send up to 30,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan, but the incoming administration does not anticipate that the Iraq-like See details


Thousands of Troops Are Deploy

President-elect Barack Obama intends to sign off on Pentagon plans to send up to 30,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan, but the incoming administration does not anticipate that the Iraq-like See details

Latest comments